toml: rename ast.Node -> ast.Value (#11974)

vlib/toml/ast/ast.v

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ pub struct Root {
 pub:
 	input input.Config // User input configuration
 pub mut:
-	table Node
+	table Value
 	// errors           []errors.Error    // all the checker errors in the file
 }
 

vlib/toml/ast/types.v

@@ -13,11 +13,19 @@ pub fn (k Key) str() string {
 	return k.text
 }
 
-// Node is a sumtype representing all possible value types
+// Value is a sumtype representing all possible value types
 // found in a TOML document.
-pub type Node = Bool | Date | DateTime | Null | Number | Quoted | Time | []Node | map[string]Node
+pub type Value = Bool
+	| Date
+	| DateTime
+	| Null
+	| Number
+	| Quoted
+	| Time
+	| []Value
+	| map[string]Value
 
-pub fn (v Node) to_json() string {
+pub fn (v Value) to_json() string {
 	match v {
 		Quoted, Date, DateTime, Time {
 			return '"$v.text"'
@@ -25,7 +33,7 @@ pub fn (v Node) to_json() string {
 		Bool, Null, Number {
 			return v.text
 		}
-		map[string]Node {
+		map[string]Value {
 			mut str := '{'
 			for key, val in v {
 				str += ' "$key": $val.to_json(),'
@@ -34,7 +42,7 @@ pub fn (v Node) to_json() string {
 			str += ' }'
 			return str
 		}
-		[]Node {
+		[]Value {
 			mut str := '['
 			for val in v {
 				str += ' $val.to_json(),'
@@ -56,8 +64,8 @@ pub fn (dtt DateTimeType) str() string {
 
 // value queries a value from the map.
 // `key` should be in "dotted" form e.g.: `"a.b.c.d"`
-pub fn (v map[string]Node) value(key string) &Node {
+pub fn (v map[string]Value) value(key string) &Value {
-	null := &Node(Null{})
+	null := &Value(Null{})
 	key_split := key.split('.')
 	// util.printdbg(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN, ' retreiving value at "$key"')
 	if key_split[0] in v.keys() {
@@ -66,8 +74,8 @@ pub fn (v map[string]Node) value(key string) &Node {
 			// TODO return error(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN + ' key "$key" does not exist')
 		}
 		// `match` isn't currently very suitable for these types of sum type constructs...
-		if value is map[string]Node {
+		if value is map[string]Value {
-			m := (value as map[string]Node)
+			m := (value as map[string]Value)
 			next_key := key_split[1..].join('.')
 			if next_key == '' {
 				return &value
@@ -81,13 +89,13 @@ pub fn (v map[string]Node) value(key string) &Node {
 }
 
 // value queries a value from the map.
-pub fn (v map[string]Node) exists(key string) bool {
+pub fn (v map[string]Value) exists(key string) bool {
 	key_split := key.split('.')
 	if key_split[0] in v.keys() {
 		value := v[key_split[0]] or { return false }
 		// `match` isn't currently very suitable for these types of sum type constructs...
-		if value is map[string]Node {
+		if value is map[string]Value {
-			m := (value as map[string]Node)
+			m := (value as map[string]Value)
 			next_key := key_split[1..].join('.')
 			if next_key == '' {
 				return true

vlib/toml/ast/walker/walker.v

@@ -2,12 +2,12 @@ module walker
 
 import toml.ast
 
-// Visitor defines a visit method which is invoked by the walker in each node it encounters.
+// Visitor defines a visit method which is invoked by the walker in each Value node it encounters.
 pub interface Visitor {
-	visit(node &ast.Node) ?
+	visit(value &ast.Value) ?
 }
 
-pub type InspectorFn = fn (node &ast.Node, data voidptr) ?
+pub type InspectorFn = fn (value &ast.Value, data voidptr) ?
 
 struct Inspector {
 	inspector_callback InspectorFn
@@ -15,23 +15,23 @@ mut:
 	data voidptr
 }
 
-pub fn (i &Inspector) visit(node &ast.Node) ? {
+pub fn (i &Inspector) visit(value &ast.Value) ? {
-	i.inspector_callback(node, i.data) or { return err }
+	i.inspector_callback(value, i.data) or { return err }
 }
 
-// inspect traverses and checks the AST node on a depth-first order and based on the data given
+// inspect traverses and checks the AST Value node on a depth-first order and based on the data given
-pub fn inspect(node &ast.Node, data voidptr, inspector_callback InspectorFn) ? {
+pub fn inspect(value &ast.Value, data voidptr, inspector_callback InspectorFn) ? {
-	walk(Inspector{inspector_callback, data}, node) ?
+	walk(Inspector{inspector_callback, data}, value) ?
 }
 
 // walk traverses the AST using the given visitor
-pub fn walk(visitor Visitor, node &ast.Node) ? {
+pub fn walk(visitor Visitor, value &ast.Value) ? {
-	if node is map[string]ast.Node {
+	if value is map[string]ast.Value {
-		n := node as map[string]ast.Node
+		value_map := value as map[string]ast.Value
-		for _, nn in n {
+		for _, val in value_map {
-			walk(visitor, &nn) ?
+			walk(visitor, &val) ?
 		}
 	} else {
-		visitor.visit(node) ?
+		visitor.visit(value) ?
 	}
 }

vlib/toml/checker/checker.v

@@ -9,22 +9,22 @@ import toml.ast.walker
 import toml.token
 import toml.scanner
 
-// Checker checks a tree of TOML `ast.Node`'s for common errors.
+// Checker checks a tree of TOML `ast.Value`'s for common errors.
 pub struct Checker {
 	scanner &scanner.Scanner
 }
 
-pub fn (c Checker) check(n &ast.Node) ? {
+pub fn (c Checker) check(n &ast.Value) ? {
 	walker.walk(c, n) ?
 }
 
-fn (c Checker) visit(node &ast.Node) ? {
+fn (c Checker) visit(value &ast.Value) ? {
-	match node {
+	match value {
 		ast.Number {
-			c.check_number(node) ?
+			c.check_number(value) ?
 		}
 		ast.Bool {
-			c.check_boolean(node) ?
+			c.check_boolean(value) ?
 		}
 		else {
 			// TODO add more checks to make BurntSushi/toml-test invalid TOML pass

vlib/toml/parser/parser.v

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ mut:
 	peek_tok  token.Token
 	skip_next bool
 	// The root map (map is called table in TOML world)
-	root_map     map[string]ast.Node
+	root_map     map[string]ast.Value
 	root_map_key string
 	// Array of Tables state
 	last_aot       string
@@ -49,11 +49,11 @@ pub fn new_parser(config Config) Parser {
 
 // init initializes the parser.
 pub fn (mut p Parser) init() ? {
-	p.root_map = map[string]ast.Node{}
+	p.root_map = map[string]ast.Value{}
 	p.next() ?
 }
 
-// run_checker validates the parsed `ast.Node` nodes in the
+// run_checker validates the parsed `ast.Value` nodes in the
 // the generated AST.
 fn (mut p Parser) run_checker() ? {
 	if p.config.run_checks {
@@ -120,9 +120,9 @@ fn (mut p Parser) expect(expected_token token.Kind) ? {
 // If some segments of the key does not exist in the root table find_table will
 // allocate a new map for each segment. This behavior is needed because you can
 // reference maps by multiple keys "dotted" (separated by "." periods) in TOML documents.
-pub fn (mut p Parser) find_table() ?&map[string]ast.Node {
+pub fn (mut p Parser) find_table() ?&map[string]ast.Value {
 	util.printdbg(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN, 'locating "$p.root_map_key" in map ${ptr_str(p.root_map)}')
-	mut t := &map[string]ast.Node{}
+	mut t := &map[string]ast.Value{}
 	unsafe {
 		t = &p.root_map
 	}
@@ -144,13 +144,13 @@ pub fn (mut p Parser) sub_table_key(key string) (string, string) {
 // If some segments of the key does not exist in the input map find_in_table will
 // allocate a new map for the segment. This behavior is needed because you can
 // reference maps by multiple keys "dotted" (separated by "." periods) in TOML documents.
-pub fn (mut p Parser) find_sub_table(key string) ?&map[string]ast.Node {
+pub fn (mut p Parser) find_sub_table(key string) ?&map[string]ast.Value {
 	mut ky := p.root_map_key + '.' + key
 	if p.root_map_key == '' {
 		ky = key
 	}
 	util.printdbg(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN, 'locating "$ky" in map ${ptr_str(p.root_map)}')
-	mut t := &map[string]ast.Node{}
+	mut t := &map[string]ast.Value{}
 	unsafe {
 		t = &p.root_map
 	}
@@ -165,12 +165,12 @@ pub fn (mut p Parser) find_sub_table(key string) ?&map[string]ast.Node {
 // If some segments of the key does not exist in the input map find_in_table will
 // allocate a new map for the segment. This behavior is needed because you can
 // reference maps by multiple keys "dotted" (separated by "." periods) in TOML documents.
-pub fn (mut p Parser) find_in_table(mut table map[string]ast.Node, key string) ?&map[string]ast.Node {
+pub fn (mut p Parser) find_in_table(mut table map[string]ast.Value, key string) ?&map[string]ast.Value {
 	// NOTE This code is the result of much trial and error.
 	// I'm still not quite sure *exactly* why it works. All I can leave here is a hope
 	// that this kind of minefield someday will be easier in V :)
 	util.printdbg(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN, 'locating "$key" in map ${ptr_str(table)}')
-	mut t := &map[string]ast.Node{}
+	mut t := &map[string]ast.Value{}
 	unsafe {
 		t = &table
 	}
@@ -184,9 +184,9 @@ pub fn (mut p Parser) find_in_table(mut table map[string]ast.Node, key string) ?
 						' this should never happen. Key "$k" was checked before access')
 				}
 				{
-					if val is map[string]ast.Node {
+					if val is map[string]ast.Value {
 						// unsafe {
-						t = &(t[k] as map[string]ast.Node)
+						t = &(t[k] as map[string]ast.Value)
 						//}
 					} else {
 						return error(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN + ' "$k" is not a map')
@@ -195,8 +195,8 @@ pub fn (mut p Parser) find_in_table(mut table map[string]ast.Node, key string) ?
 			} else {
 				util.printdbg(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN, 'no key "$k" found, allocating new map "$k" in map ${ptr_str(t)}"')
 				// unsafe {
-				t[k] = map[string]ast.Node{}
+				t[k] = map[string]ast.Value{}
-				t = &(t[k] as map[string]ast.Node)
+				t = &(t[k] as map[string]ast.Value)
 				util.printdbg(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN, 'allocated new map ${ptr_str(t)}"')
 				//}
 			}
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ pub fn (mut p Parser) sub_key() ?string {
 	return text
 }
 
-// root_table parses next tokens into the root map of `ast.Node`s.
+// root_table parses next tokens into the root map of `ast.Value`s.
 // The V `map` type is corresponding to a "table" in TOML.
 pub fn (mut p Parser) root_table() ? {
 	util.printdbg(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN, 'parsing root table...')
@@ -306,9 +306,9 @@ fn (p Parser) excerpt() string {
 	return p.scanner.excerpt(p.tok.pos, 10)
 }
 
-// inline_table parses next tokens into a map of `ast.Node`s.
+// inline_table parses next tokens into a map of `ast.Value`s.
 // The V map type is corresponding to a "table" in TOML.
-pub fn (mut p Parser) inline_table(mut tbl map[string]ast.Node) ? {
+pub fn (mut p Parser) inline_table(mut tbl map[string]ast.Value) ? {
 	util.printdbg(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN, 'parsing inline table into ${ptr_str(tbl)}...')
 
 	for p.tok.kind != .eof {
@@ -371,8 +371,8 @@ pub fn (mut p Parser) inline_table(mut tbl map[string]ast.Node) ? {
 	}
 }
 
-// array_of_tables parses next tokens into an array of `ast.Node`s.
+// array_of_tables parses next tokens into an array of `ast.Value`s.
-pub fn (mut p Parser) array_of_tables(mut table map[string]ast.Node) ? {
+pub fn (mut p Parser) array_of_tables(mut table map[string]ast.Value) ? {
 	util.printdbg(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN, 'parsing array of tables "$p.tok.kind" "$p.tok.lit"')
 	// NOTE this is starting to get ugly. TOML isn't simple at this point
 	p.check(.lsbr) ? // '[' bracket
@@ -396,8 +396,8 @@ pub fn (mut p Parser) array_of_tables(mut table map[string]ast.Node) ? {
 					' this should never happen. Key "$key_str" was checked before access')
 			}
 			{
-				if val is []ast.Node {
+				if val is []ast.Value {
-					arr := &(table[key_str] as []ast.Node)
+					arr := &(table[key_str] as []ast.Value)
 					arr << p.double_bracket_array() ?
 					table[key_str] = arr
 				} else {
@@ -413,8 +413,8 @@ pub fn (mut p Parser) array_of_tables(mut table map[string]ast.Node) ? {
 	p.last_aot_index = 0
 }
 
-// double_array_of_tables parses next tokens into an array of tables of arrays of `ast.Node`s...
+// double_array_of_tables parses next tokens into an array of tables of arrays of `ast.Value`s...
-pub fn (mut p Parser) double_array_of_tables(mut table map[string]ast.Node) ? {
+pub fn (mut p Parser) double_array_of_tables(mut table map[string]ast.Value) ? {
 	util.printdbg(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN, 'parsing array of tables of arrays "$p.tok.kind" "$p.tok.lit"')
 
 	key := p.key() ?
@@ -443,16 +443,16 @@ pub fn (mut p Parser) double_array_of_tables(mut table map[string]ast.Node) ? {
 	unsafe {
 		// NOTE this is starting to get EVEN uglier. TOML is not at all simple at this point...
 		if p.last_aot != first {
-			table[first] = []ast.Node{}
+			table[first] = []ast.Value{}
 			p.last_aot = first
-			mut t_arr := &(table[p.last_aot] as []ast.Node)
+			mut t_arr := &(table[p.last_aot] as []ast.Value)
-			t_arr << map[string]ast.Node{}
+			t_arr << map[string]ast.Value{}
 			p.last_aot_index = 0
 		}
 
-		mut t_arr := &(table[p.last_aot] as []ast.Node)
+		mut t_arr := &(table[p.last_aot] as []ast.Value)
 		mut t_map := t_arr[p.last_aot_index]
-		mut t := &(t_map as map[string]ast.Node)
+		mut t := &(t_map as map[string]ast.Value)
 
 		if last in t.keys() {
 			if val := t[last] or {
@@ -460,8 +460,8 @@ pub fn (mut p Parser) double_array_of_tables(mut table map[string]ast.Node) ? {
 					' this should never happen. Key "$last" was checked before access')
 			}
 			{
-				if val is []ast.Node {
+				if val is []ast.Value {
-					arr := &(val as []ast.Node)
+					arr := &(val as []ast.Value)
 					arr << p.double_bracket_array() ?
 					t[last] = arr
 				} else {
@@ -475,11 +475,11 @@ pub fn (mut p Parser) double_array_of_tables(mut table map[string]ast.Node) ? {
 	}
 }
 
-// array parses next tokens into an array of `ast.Node`s.
+// array parses next tokens into an array of `ast.Value`s.
-pub fn (mut p Parser) double_bracket_array() ?[]ast.Node {
+pub fn (mut p Parser) double_bracket_array() ?[]ast.Value {
-	mut arr := []ast.Node{}
+	mut arr := []ast.Value{}
 	for p.tok.kind in [.bare, .quoted, .boolean, .number] && p.peek_tok.kind == .assign {
-		mut tbl := map[string]ast.Node{}
+		mut tbl := map[string]ast.Value{}
 		key, val := p.key_value() ?
 		tbl[key.str()] = val
 		arr << tbl
@@ -488,17 +488,17 @@ pub fn (mut p Parser) double_bracket_array() ?[]ast.Node {
 	return arr
 }
 
-// array parses next tokens into an array of `ast.Node`s.
+// array parses next tokens into an array of `ast.Value`s.
-pub fn (mut p Parser) array() ?[]ast.Node {
+pub fn (mut p Parser) array() ?[]ast.Value {
 	util.printdbg(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN, 'parsing array...')
-	mut arr := []ast.Node{}
+	mut arr := []ast.Value{}
 	p.expect(.lsbr) ? // '[' bracket
 	for p.tok.kind != .eof {
 		p.next() ?
 		util.printdbg(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN, 'parsing token "$p.tok.kind" "$p.tok.lit"')
 		match p.tok.kind {
 			.boolean {
-				arr << ast.Node(p.boolean() ?)
+				arr << ast.Value(p.boolean() ?)
 			}
 			.comma {
 				util.printdbg(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN, 'skipping comma array value seperator "$p.tok.lit"')
@@ -514,20 +514,20 @@ pub fn (mut p Parser) array() ?[]ast.Node {
 				util.printdbg(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN, 'skipping comment "$c.text"')
 			}
 			.lcbr {
-				mut t := map[string]ast.Node{}
+				mut t := map[string]ast.Value{}
 				p.inline_table(mut t) ?
-				ast.Node(t)
+				ast.Value(t)
 			}
 			.number {
 				val := p.number_or_date() ?
 				arr << val
 			}
 			.quoted {
-				arr << ast.Node(p.quoted())
+				arr << ast.Value(p.quoted())
 			}
 			.lsbr {
 				util.printdbg(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN, 'parsing array in array "$p.tok.kind" "$p.tok.lit"')
-				arr << ast.Node(p.array() ?)
+				arr << ast.Value(p.array() ?)
 			}
 			.rsbr {
 				break
@@ -603,9 +603,9 @@ pub fn (mut p Parser) key() ?ast.Key {
 	return key
 }
 
-// key_value parse and returns a pair `ast.Key` and `ast.Node` type.
+// key_value parse and returns a pair `ast.Key` and `ast.Value` type.
 // see also `key()` and `value()`
-pub fn (mut p Parser) key_value() ?(ast.Key, ast.Node) {
+pub fn (mut p Parser) key_value() ?(ast.Key, ast.Value) {
 	util.printdbg(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN, 'parsing key value pair...')
 	key := p.key() ?
 	p.next() ?
@@ -615,40 +615,40 @@ pub fn (mut p Parser) key_value() ?(ast.Key, ast.Node) {
 	return key, value
 }
 
-// value parse and returns an `ast.Node` type.
+// value parse and returns an `ast.Value` type.
 // values are the token(s) appearing after an assignment operator (=).
-pub fn (mut p Parser) value() ?ast.Node {
+pub fn (mut p Parser) value() ?ast.Value {
 	util.printdbg(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN, 'parsing value...')
 	// println('parsed comment "${p.tok.lit}"')
 
-	mut value := ast.Node(ast.Null{})
+	mut value := ast.Value(ast.Null{})
 
 	util.printdbg(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN, 'parsing token "$p.tok.kind" "$p.tok.lit"')
-	// mut value := ast.Node{}
+	// mut value := ast.Value{}
 	if p.tok.kind == .number {
 		number_or_date := p.number_or_date() ?
 		value = number_or_date
 	} else {
 		value = match p.tok.kind {
 			.quoted {
-				ast.Node(p.quoted())
+				ast.Value(p.quoted())
 			}
 			.boolean {
-				ast.Node(p.boolean() ?)
+				ast.Value(p.boolean() ?)
 			}
 			.lsbr {
-				ast.Node(p.array() ?)
+				ast.Value(p.array() ?)
 			}
 			.lcbr {
-				mut t := map[string]ast.Node{}
+				mut t := map[string]ast.Value{}
 				p.inline_table(mut t) ?
-				// table[key_str] = ast.Node(t)
+				// table[key_str] = ast.Value(t)
-				ast.Node(t)
+				ast.Value(t)
 			}
 			else {
 				error(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN +
 					' value expected .boolean, .quoted, .lsbr, .lcbr or .number got "$p.tok.kind" "$p.tok.lit"')
-				ast.Node(ast.Null{}) // TODO workaround bug
+				ast.Value(ast.Null{}) // TODO workaround bug
 			}
 		}
 	}
@@ -656,25 +656,25 @@ pub fn (mut p Parser) value() ?ast.Node {
 	return value
 }
 
-// number_or_date parse and returns an `ast.Node` type as
+// number_or_date parse and returns an `ast.Value` type as
 // one of [`ast.Date`, `ast.Time`, `ast.DateTime`, `ast.Number`]
-pub fn (mut p Parser) number_or_date() ?ast.Node {
+pub fn (mut p Parser) number_or_date() ?ast.Value {
 	// Handle Date/Time
 	if p.peek_tok.kind == .minus || p.peek_tok.kind == .colon {
 		date_time_type := p.date_time() ?
 		match date_time_type {
 			ast.Date {
-				return ast.Node(date_time_type as ast.Date)
+				return ast.Value(date_time_type as ast.Date)
 			}
 			ast.Time {
-				return ast.Node(date_time_type as ast.Time)
+				return ast.Value(date_time_type as ast.Time)
 			}
 			ast.DateTime {
-				return ast.Node(date_time_type as ast.DateTime)
+				return ast.Value(date_time_type as ast.DateTime)
 			}
 		}
 	}
-	return ast.Node(p.number())
+	return ast.Value(p.number())
 }
 
 // bare parse and returns an `ast.Bare` type.

vlib/toml/toml.v

@@ -102,13 +102,13 @@ pub fn (d Doc) to_json() string {
 
 // value queries a value from the TOML document.
 pub fn (d Doc) value(key string) Any {
-	values := d.ast.table as map[string]ast.Node
+	values := d.ast.table as map[string]ast.Value
 	// any_values := d.ast_to_any(values) as map[string]Any
 	return d.get_map_value_as_any(values, key)
 }
 
-// ast_to_any_value converts `from` ast.Node to toml.Any value.
+// ast_to_any_value converts `from` ast.Value to toml.Any value.
-fn (d Doc) ast_to_any(value ast.Node) Any {
+fn (d Doc) ast_to_any(value ast.Value) Any {
 	// `match` isn't currently very suitable for further unwrapping sumtypes in the if's...
 	if value is ast.Date || value is ast.Time || value is ast.DateTime {
 		mut tim := time.Time{}
@@ -162,8 +162,8 @@ fn (d Doc) ast_to_any(value ast.Node) Any {
 			}
 			return Any(false)
 		}
-		map[string]ast.Node {
+		map[string]ast.Value {
-			m := (value as map[string]ast.Node)
+			m := (value as map[string]ast.Value)
 			mut am := map[string]Any{}
 			for k, v in m {
 				am[k] = d.ast_to_any(v)
@@ -171,8 +171,8 @@ fn (d Doc) ast_to_any(value ast.Node) Any {
 			return am
 			// return d.get_map_value(m, key_split[1..].join('.'))
 		}
-		[]ast.Node {
+		[]ast.Value {
-			a := (value as []ast.Node)
+			a := (value as []ast.Value)
 			mut aa := []Any{}
 			for val in a {
 				aa << d.ast_to_any(val)
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ fn (d Doc) ast_to_any(value ast.Node) Any {
 }
 
 // get_map_value_as_any returns the value found at `key` in the map `values` as `Any` type.
-fn (d Doc) get_map_value_as_any(values map[string]ast.Node, key string) Any {
+fn (d Doc) get_map_value_as_any(values map[string]ast.Value, key string) Any {
 	key_split := key.split('.')
 	util.printdbg(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN, ' getting "${key_split[0]}"')
 	if key_split[0] in values.keys() {
@@ -201,8 +201,8 @@ fn (d Doc) get_map_value_as_any(values map[string]ast.Node, key string) Any {
 			// panic(@MOD + '.' + @STRUCT + '.' + @FN + ' key "$key" does not exist')
 		}
 		// `match` isn't currently very suitable for these types of sum type constructs...
-		if value is map[string]ast.Node {
+		if value is map[string]ast.Value {
-			m := (value as map[string]ast.Node)
+			m := (value as map[string]ast.Value)
 			next_key := key_split[1..].join('.')
 			if next_key == '' {
 				return d.ast_to_any(value)